The Immaculate Deception
Posted : 06 Dec 2017Page Navigator
GoNarrator
To start the narrator click "Listen" or press "ALT+A"It can be started from any page, and will read through the rest of the text with a slight delay while loading each new page.
Exactly so, in this latter respect, also was it in ancient Babylon. The Babylonians, in their popular religion, supremely worshipped a Goddess ‘Mother and Son, who was represented in pictures and images as an infant or child in his mother’s arms. From Babylon, this worship of the Mother and Child spread to the ends of the earth. In Egypt, the Mother and Child were worshipped under the names of Isis and Osiris. In India, even to this day (Hislop’s book was originally published in 1857), as Isi and Iswara. In Asia as Cybele and Deoius, in Pagan Rome as Fortuna and Jupiterpuer or Jupiter the boy, in Greece as Ceres the Great Mother with the babe at her breast, or as Irene the goddess of Peace with the boy Plutus in her arms; and even in Thibet , in China and Japan, the Jesuit missionaries were astonished to find the counterpart of Madonna and her child as devoutly worshipped as in Papal Rome itself; Shing Moo, the Holy Mother in China, being represented with a child in her arms and a glory around her exactly as if a Roman Catholic artist had been employed to set her up.”
Lust! The lust of Semiramis to modern day “Mary” and even “Mother Earth”. And how much more “pure” can it all seem then to have a young girl whom “has never had sex” to bring maximum idolatry to the earth? The “virgin birth” as commonly and widely accepted is the continuous resurrection of the spirit of Nimrod and his wife Semiramis, whom Nimrod allowed to be exalted by and through the spirit of lust. The spirit of lust knew the best way to disguise itself; a virgin of course.
And what about you? Why have you believed and then proferred the idea of the common view of the virgin birth? Ignorance? Laziness? A spirit of lust? The equating of being nonsexual with holiness? All of these and more if you have the courage to See it. “Be fruitful and multiply” was of course first a spiritual matter, but it was also to manifest on physical earth. To procreate was the command, not to abstain. Think it not crude that Hebraic intent never focused on the physical, non -sexual existence in any matter whatsoever. Being free from sexual activity was in no way a sign of mental purity, and if you are calling to receive it, the male is always the symbol of morality and purity from Hebrew context. Was it not Eve the original seducer of man’s purity? Was not carnal sensuality the very “knowledge of evil” that was forbidden by Yahweh? “Do not eat (mentally digest) from that tree (“truth” that leads to destruction)!”